On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 08:37:41AM +0800, Edward Dekkers wrote: > Other users - seriously - let's not debate over the number hey? Who cares > what it's called as long as it works?
But that's the point, from my view. I *always* skipped the x.0's (in fact, I skipped the x.1's as well) and reading about them on redhat-list usually comfirmed that decision. Up until now, the x.0 was followed up with *very* stable, compatible versions as point release - most of the time that were the x.2's, with the exception of 7.x -> 7.3. 4.2, 5.2, 6.2 and 7.3 were very good, the lot of them. That's why I'm waiting for a stable 8.x, not for another x.0 release, which again has new major problems to be shaken out. Cheerio, Thomas -- ==> RH List Archive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=redhat-list&r=1&w=2 <== ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas Ribbrock http://www.ribbrock.org "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!" -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
