Edward Dekkers wrote:
Seriously, if it is not a 9.0, that would imply there will be no 9.1?
Does this represent a change to just 9 -> 10 -> 11 -> 12?


No. apparently - there will be an 9 SE, then service pack 1, 2, 3 etc.

(grins and ducks)

Regards,


i was thinking in the lines of 9 ME, 9 XP, 2001 : )


gene
--
<<gyoo [at] attbi [dot] com>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iQCUAwUBPhxERRxoVYCzmrKXAQJK5gP3Y7CTsFyKpEz2p5W4GWI9+qSm+kWfdJ0R
xNlma0Ma9rAL/OBJcZMo5IXyXas+3Edogbv4Al6dIf8lot1WS0Iaxxl/cg2f7gf+
otf7LfNpZDE/6OzR7A1qN6baPMLSjGzywwQWMfSVuWWb6kGQxMsA13Kn68G7Ozxs
5CODZqUPyg==
=AolA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to