Gustav Schaffter wrote: > Very interesting. Makes me think of NextStep. Wasn't that built with the > same idea? Extending existing classes on the fly? Well, not as I recall. The kick on NextStep was that it was a graphical toolkit in the same way that the shell and Unix was a CLI toolkit--you could assemble graphical commands from components in the same way you could builld commands from the CLI command line. -- Dave Ihnat [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Re: OT: Anyone try Corel Linux Dean Irvin
- Re: OT: Anyone try Corel Linux Frank Rocco
- Re: OT: Anyone try Corel Linux Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- OT: Windows on Linux history [was Re: OT: Anyone tr... Alan Mead
- OT:Re: Windows on Linux history [was Re: OT: ... Rob Saul
- Re: OT: Windows on Linux history [was Re: OT: ... Paul M. Foster
- Re: OT: Windows on Linux history [was Re: ... Dave Ihnat
- Re: OT: Windows on Linux history [was ... Gustav Schaffter
- Re: OT: Windows on Linux history [... Dave Ihnat
- Re: OT: Windows on Linux hist... Gustav Schaffter
- Re: OT: Windows on Linux ... Dave Ihnat
- Re: OT: Windows on Linux history [was Re: ... ian stanley
- Re: OT: Windows on Linux history [was Re: ... Rob Saul
- [OT] History of the mouse Alan Mead
- RE: [OT] History of the mouse Juha Saarinen
- RE: [OT] History of the mouse Alan Mead
- RE: [OT] History of the m... Nate Waddoups
- RE: [OT] History of the m... Manuel Camacho
- RE: [OT] History of the m... M. Erickson
- Re: [OT] History of the mouse Michael Coxe
- Re: [OT] History of the mouse Manuel Camacho