sorry, I should have mentioned that linux only saw 64MB of RAM, so I had
to tell it about the other 192MB :)
So yes, the MB has an issue there, but no others that I have noticed.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Alan Mead wrote:
> I'm in a similar situation (except no Athalon on the horizon)... IIRC, The
> HCL at Red Hat's web site claims that some Athalon MB's are partially
> incompatible with Linux but the chip itself is no problem.
>
> At 03:10 PM 1/20/00 -0600, Carey F. Cox wrote:
> >
> >I remember reading some posts recently about the Athlon processor. I didn't
> >pay attention to those at the time, but now I have someone asking about
> >putting Linux on one of those chips. How compatible are these chips
> >with RH6.0 or greater? What are the problems being experienced?
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
