> The long and the short of it is...do not blame the vendor's installation > process for making assumptions for you when you really should have known > better. I feel for your loss, but "thems the breaks." > Michael B. Weiner Yes I can blame the vendor. Even if doing a server install, not all of the disks in the machine are going to get Linux placed on to them. Yes, they more than likely will get mounted after the install. Therefore, RedHat, or any vendor for that matter, should ask which disks are actually going to be used for the install. The vendor should not blindly assume that all of the disks are, especially if there is more than one. MB -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Re: [REDHAT] Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Jerry Winegarden
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Tim Hockin
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Anthony E. Greene
- problem with nfsd mount and rpc.quotad Hugo Bouckaert
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Dave Ihnat
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Hal Burgiss
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Jasper Jans
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Anthony E. Greene
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Vidiot
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed hUnTeR
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Vidiot
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Jasper Jans
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Vidiot
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Anthony E. Greene
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Vidiot
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Tim Hockin
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Anthony E. Greene
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Stephen M Lavelle
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Edward Dekkers
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Vidiot
- Re: RH Installation MUST be fixed Dave Reed