This is Linux after all, and just like a message I read about GLIBC and
RedHat being the first to implement it in a customer release... "Somone's
got to do it.".
Testing/implementing a product should be part of everyone's production
implementation phases. 7.0 may be the more stable platform for customer X,
but not for customer Y, depending on their requirements.
So be it, but I want *innovation* to happen from RedHat and other Linux
leaders...
Marco
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Yates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 10:23 AM
Subject: ver 7.0
> I have been using RH since ver 4.0. I have also faithfully upgraded to the
> next version of RH the first day I could get my hands on it. That is until
> this 7.0 upgrade. I bought the cd, but I can't make myself feel good about
> upgrading to ver 7.0. Between this redhat network thing, the
"non-compliant
> gcc", it just seems to be a .0 release worth skipping. Any thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
