Maybe. AFAIK, the only wu-ftp that is affected is the version that is
right off the install CDs for 6.2.
which is wu-ftpd-2.6.0-3.i386.rpm
I would imagine that the one listed on the errata page is probably
safe. You could also try upgrading to 2.6.1, but I dont knwo if that will
break any dependencies anywere else (i.e. anonftp, or any libs that may be
deprecated or incompatible with 2.6.1 that may exist on a 6.2 install.)
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> So wu-ftpd 2.6.0 is infected?
>
> When I look at RH Errata, I can see an update for wu-ftpd, but that is:
>
> wu-ftpd-2.6.0-14.6x
>
> and I am running that version. Am I vulnerable for the attack?
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
