that's what's just so odd
neither machines are running a firewall
unless rh62 comes with a firewall running off the install
so if there's nothing between the two machines
why would there be a delay in telnet/ftp logins?
everywhere i look to, reverse dns seems to be the problem
but since the sparc box is using my dns server to access the web
i'm thinking i've missed something in the dns config... but what?




On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 12:40, Robert Finneran wrote:
> I don't really know, but it is likely that your firewall settings are not
> set properly to receive pings on one of your machines. There are several
> types ICMP messages that need to pass through the firewall for a ping to
> work. However it is unlikely that your ping problem is related to the other
> issues you are seeing.
> 
> Stay tuned, with the help of others on this list we should be able to figure
> things out!
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of gabriel
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: suprise lag (new development)
> 
> 
> well i've had a new development in my mission to find out what's goin'
> on with this sparc rh62 box.
> 
> to recap there's 2 machines
> (sparc64, rh62, 192.168.0.4) and (pI, rh72, 192.168.0.5)
> pI is the nameserver
> 
> the sparc box can serve up content through apache
> and i can telnet/ftp into it from the pI box, but only after a wait time
> of like a minute or so.
> 
> now the new news
> i can see webpages hosted on the pI box from the sparc box, but i CAN'T
> ping the pI box from the sparc.  i can however ping yahoo from the
> sparc.
> 
> however, i CAN ping the sparc from the pI and see http content on the
> sparc box from the pI.
> 
> the sparc box can surf the web and see the world, but it can't ping
> itself (ping 192.168.0.5) or the pI box (ping 192.168.0.5).  both
> however can ping the 127.0.0.1 without problems
> 
> one more thing,
> when i've tried to ping the sparc from itself or pI, i've never returned
> a complete 100% packet loss.  there's always one, (and only one) packet
> that gets through...
> 
> this is so frustrating......
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to