On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Mike Burger wrote: > > > I'm not suggesting using a full /12 block. I was just noting that that > > range, like the 192.168 range, is listed as "private space"...you're fine > > with what you have...and the /24 that you'reusing. > > Hello > > So, do you means I can setup the NAT like this ? > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE > > Thank for your help !
The short answer to the question above is yes. Note...if you just want to masquerade (as your line will do...not really NAT), you don't even need the "-s 192.168.0.0/24" listed in the line. iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE Will work just as well. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
