Mike Burger wrote: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Mike Burger wrote: > > > > > I'm not suggesting using a full /12 block. I was just noting that that > > > range, like the 192.168 range, is listed as "private space"...you're fine > > > with what you have...and the /24 that you'reusing. > > > > Hello > > > > So, do you means I can setup the NAT like this ? > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE > > > > Thank for your help ! > > The short answer to the question above is yes. > > Note...if you just want to masquerade (as your line will do...not really > NAT), you don't even need the "-s 192.168.0.0/24" listed in the line. > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE > > Will work just as well.
If remove "-s 192.168.0.0/24", then the iptables how to range ip address for the clients connect to Internet ? Ed. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
