I'm just saying this. I hope the Sox never spend money on a guy because of
his Wins numbers if he has a bad ERA.

That luck stuff always balances out eventually.


On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Beaudoin, John <[email protected]>wrote:

>  I remember a year, and I’m sure there were many more, when Okajima had a
> fantastic ERA, but he’d always let in inherited runners.  ALWAYS.  He was
> mediocre as a pitcher, but had a fantastic ERA.
>
>
>
> And, recently, as another proof, Wakefield was left in to give up 7 runs in
> the first two innings.  That does happen where a manager leaves a starter in
> when he just doesn’t have it.  The pitcher can give up 9 runs in two innings
> and it destroys his ERA and it was just a bad day.  The rest of his starts
> could be 1.5 ERA, but the 9 runs in 2 innings throws it all off.  ERA can be
> many runs in one game and few runs in ten games.  The object of the game is
> to WIN.  Psychology does play into the game.  Guys get up to play behind
> some pitchers.  Pitching matchups are sometimes chosen by managers when
> going into a series.  Everything factors in.
>
>
>
> This is a standard argument of the stats guys against me (I have feelings,
> man.  I’m perceiving and feeling, not just a computer or almanac).  J
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Beaudoin, John
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:17 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: Sheesh!
>
>
>
> Good point, Ray.
>
> But, if you think about the contrary, then you might realize that everyone
> in the country wanted to see Pedro.
>
>
>
> And how many pitchers on any team would you say that about?
>
>
>
> I don’t even care to see Sabathia.
>
>
>
> Lincecum and the new Amercan League phenom (name escapes me now) are the
> two I can think of.
>
>
>
> I am happy to see Lester or Buchholz or even Wake.  I don’t have a problem
> not having a Pedro or Roger on the team. Those types of draws only happen
> probably 30% of all baseball years for elite teams.
>
>
>
> I still like WINS.  You can argue all the reasons all you want.  There are
> problems with all other stats, too.  But if a guy wins 20 games and has a
> 4.5 ERA, what are people going to say?  “He’s a 20-game winner.”  Of course,
> guys on this board would argue that the stats don’t show him as a 20-game
> winner.
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ray Salemi
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:22 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Sheesh!
>
>
>
> Dan, that's why I say Wins are luck.
>
>
>
> I don't believe in the "play better behind a guy" theory.
>
>
>
> BTW.  Lackey is receiving the second best run support of his career. The
> Sox are scoring 5.2 runs per 9 innings of his pitching.
>
>
>
> All this comes down to one question in my mind: Am I excited to go see the
> guy pitch?
>
>
>
> Lester -- sure
>
> Dice-K-- No.  Will actually avoid his games
>
> Wake--Always fun
>
> Buchholtz--Yup
>
> Lackey--Saw him.  It was OK
>
>
>
> But there are no pitchers like Pedro or Clemens on this team where I feel
> lucky to get to a game with them pitching.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Dan DiBiase <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I agree that Wins are important, but I don't think they are always a
> measure of just the *pitcher's* effectiveness. Sometimes
> a team just plays better behind a guy. Maybe it's because he's a fast
> worker and keeps the defense on their toes. Or maybe
> a ground-ball pitcher and the team has an excellent 'ground ball' defense.
> Or maybe they just seem to hit better when a
> particular guy is pitching.... Lackey is a good example this year. I don't
> think anyone would say he has pitched great, and
> he has an ERA of 4.65, yet he is 9-5, which is certainly a good record
> (although it can certainly be debated whether it is
> good enough for a supposed #1 making over $18 million this year...).
>
>
>
>
>
> Dan D
> Central NJ USA
>
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* "Beaudoin, John" <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
>
> *Sent:* Tue, July 20, 2010 11:32:16 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Sheesh!
>
>
>
> ERA can be one horrendous game or a season of terrible middle relief.
>
> I think the data just provided (referring to Dice K) shows how an outlier
> datapoint game throws his ERA out of whack.
>
> W's are the most important thing.
>
> Hey, are you going to the game tomorrow?
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From*: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *To*: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Sent*: Tue Jul 20 20:03:03 2010
> *Subject*: Re: Sheesh!
>
> W&L is just a measure of run support or luck.
>
>
>
> It's meaningless.
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Beaudoin, John <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> W's and L's mean more than ERA, don't you think? ERA is a very very very
> very good 2nd stat to look at.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From*: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *To*: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>
> *Sent*: Tue Jul 20 17:53:02 2010
> *Subject*: Re: Sheesh!
>
> This is why God gave us states.
>
>
>
> Dice-K ERA: 4.29
>
>
>
> 4.29 = Meh
>
>
>
> And that sums up his season.
>
>
>
> Dice-K has a long way to go before I'll get excited about seeing him pitch.
>
>
>
> Ray
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Steve Ouellette <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> That's just not true. Dice K's perceived sins far outweigh the truth.
>
> On June 7, he threw eight shutout innings.
>
> That was followed by ...
>
> 2 runs in 5 IP
> 3 runs in 6 IP
> 4 runs in 5 IP (an ugly 8 hits and 4 bb)
> 2 runs in 6 IP
> and last night, 1 run in 6.7 IP
>
> Prior to the eight shutout innings on June 7, he had given up ...
>
> 3 runs in 6.7 IP (no walks!)
> 3 runs in 4.7 IP (2 hits, but 8 walks!)
> 0 runs in 8 IP (1 hit)
>
> He can still be excruciating to watch, he doesn't go deep into most games
> and his first innings have been nightmares, but he hasn't had four straight
> pitiful starts (though three of his first four were bad). In his last nine
> starts, he's only given up more than three earned runs once (and that was
> four). Six of them were "quality" starts.
>
> Steve O
>
>
>
>  On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Larry Rupp <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm normally the optimist here but last time he had a good game he followed
> that with 4 straight pitiful ones so until I see some consistency from him
> he's not getting out of the penalty box with me.  It's nice to see Beckett
> back which leaves Lackey, Wake, and Dice to fight for the 2 starting spots
> in a 5 man rotation.
>
> Sent from Larry's mobile device
>
>
> On Jul 20, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Dan DiBiase <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Having basically discounted him this season, preferring to depend on
> Lester, Bucky and Lackey, if Dice-K could get
> on a nice streak like this, what a benefit that would be.
>
>
>
> Dan D
> Central NJ USA
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* "Beaudoin, John" <[email protected]>
> *To:* <[email protected]>[email protected]
> *Sent:* Tue, July 20, 2010 11:57:09 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Sheesh!
>
> He didn't want to pitch to them. Smart move on his part probably.
>
> He was brilliant.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From*: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *To*: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Sent*: Tue Jul 20 08:54:10 2010
> *Subject*: RE: Sheesh!
>
> OK - Admit it.  Dice-K was almost enjoyable to watch last night.  I have
> never seen him more efficient.  I actually stayed awake through 7 because I
> was enjoying the show.
>
>
>
> Funny thing is that he walked only two batters, and both of them were on 4
> straight balls.  How do you figure?
>
>
>
> Steve G
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> <http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en>
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> <http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en>
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>    --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide"
> www.fpgasimulation.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide"
> www.fpgasimulation.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide"
> www.fpgasimulation.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>



-- 
Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide"
www.fpgasimulation.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

Reply via email to