I'm talking a jump of, what, 40 points in OPS, from a once highly-touted
prospect who came up to the majors too early. I don't think that's
outrageous.

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Matt & Olga McSorley
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Salty career: 262 games, 849 at-bats: .246-.312-.379. That's not an
> insignificant sample size and he's never produced at the .260-.330-.400
> level.
>
> And he can't reliably throw to the mound.
>
> As for whether catchers make a difference to pitchers, I can't say for
> sure. But when a pitcher as accomplished as Curt Schilling says it makes a
> significant difference, I have to weigh that at least as heavily as the
> research of a numbers guy in the Indians' front office who's never played
> the game.
>
> -- Matt
>   .246 .312 .379 .692
>
>   246 .312 .379 .692
>   246 .312 .379 .692
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Steve Ouellette <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Fri, April 22, 2011 6:47:40 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: Tek must go
>
> ... in 36 at bats. He's not the reason the team is struggling, so why
> not give him a full opportunity to prove himself one way or the other?
> I don't think a .260-.330-.400 season is an outlandish expectation,
> and that would be an above average catcher performance at this point.
>
> Steve O
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Matt & Olga McSorley
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Perhaps not. But Saltalamacchia is providing neither production nor
> defense.
> >
> > -- Matt
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Ray Salemi <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Fri, April 22, 2011 6:40:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: Tek must go
> >
> > I'm sorry.  Tek is not making up for flailing at the plate and
> > throwing behind baserunners with canny pitch calling.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I think I'm saying Beckett pitches better to Varitek than other
> catchers.
> >>
> >> But your numbers are compelling. I agree with your suggestion that we
> sign
> >> Puffs Rodriguez.
> >>
> >> On Apr 22, 2011 6:03 PM, "Steve Ouellette" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>> That's not consistent. You're saying Tek is five runs better than the
> >>> generic catcher defensively? Per game?
> >>>
> >>> Beckett's ERA with Paul Lo Duca, Mike Redmond and noted poor pitch
> >>> caller Pudge Rodriguez: 3.46.
> >>>
> >>> Steve O
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>> Those numbers are consistent with Beckett's Tek vs. Non-Tek numbers
> over
> >>>> the
> >>>> past four years. To say catchers don't matter is silly.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Apr 22, 2011 5:14 PM, "Ray Salemi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> This is a low sample size issue.
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected].
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Author of Robot Haiku : Poems for humans to read until their robots
> > decide it's kill time.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to redsoxcitizens+
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

Reply via email to