That said, I'm going to be the first to throw the name Jesus Flores out
there. Once a pretty good young catcher, missed last year with an injury,
now stuck behind Pudge Rodriguez and Wilson Ramos in Washington.

Steve O

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Steve Ouellette <[email protected]>wrote:

> I'm talking a jump of, what, 40 points in OPS, from a once highly-touted
> prospect who came up to the majors too early. I don't think that's
> outrageous.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Matt & Olga McSorley <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Salty career: 262 games, 849 at-bats: .246-.312-.379. That's not an
>> insignificant sample size and he's never produced at the .260-.330-.400
>> level.
>>
>> And he can't reliably throw to the mound.
>>
>> As for whether catchers make a difference to pitchers, I can't say for
>> sure. But when a pitcher as accomplished as Curt Schilling says it makes a
>> significant difference, I have to weigh that at least as heavily as the
>> research of a numbers guy in the Indians' front office who's never played
>> the game.
>>
>> -- Matt
>>   .246 .312 .379 .692
>>
>>   246 .312 .379 .692
>>   246 .312 .379 .692
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* Steve Ouellette <[email protected]>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Sent:* Fri, April 22, 2011 6:47:40 PM
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: Tek must go
>>
>> ... in 36 at bats. He's not the reason the team is struggling, so why
>> not give him a full opportunity to prove himself one way or the other?
>> I don't think a .260-.330-.400 season is an outlandish expectation,
>> and that would be an above average catcher performance at this point.
>>
>> Steve O
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Matt & Olga McSorley
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Perhaps not. But Saltalamacchia is providing neither production nor
>> defense.
>> >
>> > -- Matt
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Ray Salemi <[email protected]>
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Sent: Fri, April 22, 2011 6:40:43 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Tek must go
>> >
>> > I'm sorry.  Tek is not making up for flailing at the plate and
>> > throwing behind baserunners with canny pitch calling.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> I think I'm saying Beckett pitches better to Varitek than other
>> catchers.
>> >>
>> >> But your numbers are compelling. I agree with your suggestion that we
>> sign
>> >> Puffs Rodriguez.
>> >>
>> >> On Apr 22, 2011 6:03 PM, "Steve Ouellette" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> That's not consistent. You're saying Tek is five runs better than the
>> >>> generic catcher defensively? Per game?
>> >>>
>> >>> Beckett's ERA with Paul Lo Duca, Mike Redmond and noted poor pitch
>> >>> caller Pudge Rodriguez: 3.46.
>> >>>
>> >>> Steve O
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> Those numbers are consistent with Beckett's Tek vs. Non-Tek numbers
>> over
>> >>>> the
>> >>>> past four years. To say catchers don't matter is silly.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Apr 22, 2011 5:14 PM, "Ray Salemi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>> This is a low sample size issue.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> >>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>> [email protected].
>> >>> For more options, visit this group at
>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> >> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> [email protected].
>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Author of Robot Haiku : Poems for humans to read until their robots
>> > decide it's kill time.
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> > "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> > "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to redsoxcitizens+
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

Reply via email to