I don't think it's controversial. I'm just surprised the process was described 
as two camps between ownership and baseball operations. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 2, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not from my perspective. I also don't think it's at all controversial for 
> ownership to say, "Sorry Ben, your guy Dale just isn't doing it for us." Go 
> out and find somebody else. Oh, and while you're looking .....
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is it even possible to consider that this wouldn't be an assumed part of the 
> job in 2012?
> 
> I was surprised that the baseball operations folks had not considered 
> experience to be an important point early in the process. I'm glad they came 
> around on that point.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Dec 2, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Steve Ouellette <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Ideally, I think the idea is that you want to hire someone who
> > realizes that "this guy hits well against that guy" is valuable
> > information.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> That would not be in line at all. Your exaggerated statement defeats your
> >> point. I'm not talking about the owner flashing the take sign from his box.
> >> I'm saying a GM - armed with data - saying this guy hits well against that
> >> guy so we should consider allowing this guy to hit against that guy.
> >>
> >> Didn't realize you were such a goodbaseballman. I like your fedora, here's 
> >> a
> >> cigar to chomp on.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm sorry Mr. Owner, but lineups are below your pay grade.
> >>>
> >>> That would be line Kraft being consulted on 4th and inches.
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
> >>> On Dec 2, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm on the owner or the GM I better damn well have some input on what goes
> >>> on. I don't even have a problem with them consulting or even suggesting 
> >>> line
> >>> ups and who plays or sits versus certain appointments. The manager still 
> >>> has
> >>> plenty to do managing the clubhouse and the actual game.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes. That's the Grady Little rule.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>
> >>>> On Dec 2, 2011, at 4:52 AM, Dan DiBiase <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Just that one of their requirements was that they have 'input' on the 'on
> >>>> the field' activities. They wanted a manager that would be open
> >>>> to 'suggestions' from the front office.
> >>>>
> >>>> Dan D
> >>>>
> >>>> ________________________________
> >>>> From: Ray Salemi <[email protected]>
> >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 2:27 PM
> >>>> Subject: Re: How Bobby V Got the Job
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't see how these are the least bit incompatible.
> >>>>
> >>>> A big personality who loses is worthless.
> >>>> Anyone who wins will deliver more cash than a loser.
> >>>>
> >>>> So it seems they are the same.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not sure what you mean by baseball operations wanting to "have a say
> >>>> on how the team performs on a daily basis."   I literally don't 
> >>>> understand
> >>>> the sentence.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ray
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Dec 1, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Dan DiBiase <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Different goals? Ownership is primarily concerned with filling seats and
> >>>> revenue - by-products of winning but also generated by
> >>>> big personalities. Baseball Ops is concerned with winning now AND in the
> >>>> future and with having a say in how the team performs
> >>>> on a daily basis.
> >>>>
> >>>> Dan D
> >>>>
> >>>> ________________________________
> >>>> From: Ray Salemi <[email protected]>
> >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 2:01 PM
> >>>> Subject: Re: How Bobby V Got the Job
> >>>>
> >>>> This was an excellent article.  So much of the analysis and writing about
> >>>> the managerial process started and ended with "Luchino is the Dick 
> >>>> Cheney"
> >>>> of the Red Sox.  This was a thoughtful discussion of how the team made an
> >>>> important business decision.
> >>>>
> >>>> It did strike me that "baseball operations" and "ownership" were broken
> >>>> into camps who required dialog and compromise to come to a decision.  I
> >>>> wonder what makes that happen?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Dec 1, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Dan DiBiase <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Interesting take on the manager's search. I'm sure Dan Shaughnessy won't
> >>>> buy it.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/alex-speier/2011/12/01/v-victory-now-how-bobby-valentine-became-red-s
> >>>>
> >>>> Dan D
> >>>> Central NJ USA
> >>>> --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> [email protected].
> >>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> [email protected].
> >>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> [email protected].
> >>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> [email protected].
> >>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> [email protected].
> >>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> [email protected].
> >>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected].
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected].
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> > http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

Reply via email to