Pak Eka, dalam proses yang saya lakukan, digunakan induksi bersinerji dengan refleksi. Kedua proses ini ternyata sangat kuat perannya untuk menguak fenomena yang sedang kita amati, karena ketika kita tenggelam di dalam lautan teks atau lautan fenomena visual, refleksi membantu kita melihat kembali seluruhnya sampai sangat detil tanpa kehilangan arah. Jadi siklusnya induksi - refleksi. Begitu kayaknya.
Salam, Djarot Purbadi http://realmwk.wordpress.com [Blog Resmi MWK] http://forumriset.wordpress.com [Blog Resmi APRF] http://fenomenologiarsitektur.wordpress.com --- On Sat, 12/19/09, ffekadj <[email protected]> wrote: From: ffekadj <[email protected]> Subject: [referensi] Re: posmo, induktif vs deduktif Pak Djarot To: [email protected] Date: Saturday, December 19, 2009, 9:09 AM Pak Eko ysb, bapak juga tidak salah, mungkin terpengaruh Malinowski dengan kalimatnya yang sangat terkenal: "Imagine yourself suddenly set down surrounded by all your gear, alone on a tropical beach close to a native village, while the launch or dinghy which has brought you sails away out of sight". Metode tangan kosong biasanya untuk menjawab pertanyaan 'how'; sebaliknya untuk menjawab pertanyaan 'why' perlu metode dan analisis deduksi-induksi- retroduksi dst. Because the present is not an assumption. Namun menarik juga nih, bagaimana sejak Aristoteles sampai Lefebvre (analisis dan) metode induksi bisa dilakukan tanpa theoritical understanding. Namun abaikan saja dulu pertanyaan ini, dapat disimpan untuk program post-doc nanti. Happy New Year 1431. Salam. -ekadj --- In refere...@yahoogrou ps.com, Eko B K <ekobu...@.. .> wrote: > > Pak Eka, > > Terimakasih atas bantuannya.. . tapi Pak Eka mungkin tercampur antara analytic induction dan inductive method/reasoning. .. inductive method jauh lebih tua dari usia Om George Herbert Mead dan Florian Znaniecki, bahkan lebih tua dari Univ of Chicago sendiri hehe... Pak Djarot pernah cerita bahwa Mendel dulu menggunakan induksi, saya juga ceritakan bahwa Darwin juga menggunakan inductive method...kalau ditarik lebih jauh lagi ya Newton, Bacon, sampai ke jaman Aristoteles. ..:) > Tapi terimakasih atas infonya... > > salam.. > > > > --- On Fri, 12/18/09, ffekadj 4ek...@... wrote: > > From: ffekadj 4ek...@... > Subject: [referensi] Re: posmo, induktif vs deduktif Pak Djarot > To: refere...@yahoogrou ps.com > Date: Friday, December 18, 2009, 6:37 PM > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > > > Pak Djarot ysh, supaya 'betul'nya, kita bisa telusuri asal mula istilah > > 'analytic induction', yang dipopulerkan oleh Peter K Manning melalui > > beberapa buku yaitu "Semiotics and Fieldwork" (1987) dan "Analytic > > Induction" (1991). Dia mengakui analytic induction diturunkan dari > > penulisan ilmiah George Herbert Mead dan Florian Znaniecki, termasuk > > dari pengembangan Chicago School. Supaya tidak salah saya ungkapkan > > definisi aslinya: analytic induction was a nonexperimental qualitative > > sociological method that employs an exhaustive examination of cases in > > order to prove universal, causal generalizations. > > > > Lebih lanjut: The claim to universality of the causal generalizations is > > the weakest, for it is derived from the examination of a single case > > studied in light of a 'preformulated hypothesis' that might be > > reformulated if the hypothesis does not fit the facts. And 'practical > > certainty' of the (reformulated) hypothesis is obtained 'after a small > > number cases has been examined'. Discovery of a single negative case is > > held to disprove the hypothesis and to require its reformulation. After > > 'certainty' has been attained, 'for purposes of proof, cases outside the > > area circumscribed by the definition are examined to determine whether > > or not the final hypothesis applies to them. If it does, it is implied, > > there is something wrong with the hypothesis, for 'scientific > > generalizations consist of descriptions of conditions which are always > > present when the phenomenon is absent'. The two keys to the entire > > procedure are the definition of the phenomenon under investigation and > > the formulation of the tentative hypothesis. Ultimately, however, > > despite its aim, analytic induction does not live up to the scientific > > demand that its theories 'understand, predict, and control events'. > > > > Analytic induction is not a means of prediction; it does not clearly > > establish causality; and it probably cannot endure a principled > > examination of its claims to [be] making universal statements. Indeed, > > according to the most demanding ideal standards of the discipline, > > analytic induction as a distinctive, philosophical, methodological > > perspective is less powerful than either enumerative induction of > > axiomatic-modelling methods. > > > > Silahkan bapak2 dikutip, lumayan untuk meyakinkan promotornya, dan boleh > > ditambah didaftar pustaka: > > > > Manning, P.K. (1987). Semiotics and Fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage > > > > Manning, P.K. (1991). Analytic Induction. In K. Plummer (Ed.), Symbolic > > Interactionism: Vol. 2. Contemporary Issues (pp. 401-430). Brookfield, > > VE: Edward Elgar > > > > Salam, > > > > -ekadj > > > > --- In refere...@yahoogrou ps.com, Eko B K ekobudik@ .> wrote: > > > > > > Pak Djarot, kalimat2 saya tsb bukan merespon posting bapak, tapi > > posting pak Eka, maaf kalau saya lupa memberikan salam awal kepada siapa > > itu ditujukan... > > > > > > posting saya merespon posting pak Eka yg sbb: > > > >>>"Jadi fieldwork dengan analisis induktif sebenarnya tidak masuk ke > > > lapangan dengan tangan kosong, telah ada skema pengetahuan yang > > > dimiliki peneliti sebelumnya, biasanya melalui comparison method. > > Suatu > > > informasi diuji berkali-kali dengan berbagai pandangan ilmu hingga > > > sampai pada batas tertentu.">> > > > > > > > yah kalau ke lapangan sudah penuh dgn teori dan ketika di lapangan > > kita membandingkan teori2 tsb dgn kondisi di lapangan seperti kata pak > > Eka, bagi saya ini sama dgn testing hipothesis, yakni deduksi... saya > > kira Pak Djarot sepaham dgn saya karena bapak sering mengatakan bahwa > > dlm proses konstruksi hipothesis melalui metode induksi, kita memang > > harus melupakan sejenak semua teori2 di kepala, setelah diakhir > > penelitian hipothesis selesai dikonstruksi baru kita bandingkan dgn > > teori2 yg ada... > > > > > > salam... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 12/18/09, Djarot Purbadi dpurbadi@ wrote: > > > > > > From: Djarot Purbadi dpurbadi@ > > > Subject: Re: [referensi] Re: posmo, induktif vs deduktif Pak Djarot > > > To: refere...@yahoogrou ps.com > > > Date: Friday, December 18, 2009, 4:06 PM >
