David Masover wrote:
> Peter wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 17:27:20 -0500, David Masover wrote:
>> snip...
>>>> both mkfs.reiserfs and fsck.reiserfs have -B option to accept list of
>>>> bad blocks. We thought that should be enough.
>>> It really should. Why bother with a patch? Just write a wrapper
>>> script
>>> that runs badblocks and passes in the list to mkfs.
>>
>> It was just a thought from userland. My perspective was that a user,
>> not a
>> hard-boiled geek, might get lulled into a false sense of security but
>> may
>> not have the wherewithal to write a wrapper. If nothing else, when the
>> final doc is written (did I say final?:)), it should include a notice
>> about not running badblocks.
>
> Well, let's see... Most hard drives come more thoroughly tested at
> the factory than anything badblocks would do.
They leave more tested, they arrive.... ;-) and you assume it is a new
drive.....
> Also, it seems redundant to have every single mkfs have to implement a
> badblocks flag..
>
> I'd suggest a universal wrapper, then, or a modification to the "mkfs"
> frontend, so that this works the same way across all filesystems.
> Something like "mkfs -B -t reiser4"
>
>
