I have to admit that as long as we are talking about private resources, I have 
a hard time understanding the argument that there is no burden on religious 
institutions here. The private resources of religious institutions are 
dedicated to conduct obligated by or at least consistent with religious beliefs 
and doctrine. How can it not be a burden on the institution's religious liberty 
for the state to require those resources to be used in a way that violates the 
religious principles to which the institution is committed.

As for the analogy to taxes, I have always though there was a burden here 
-although it is attenuated, difficult to mitigate, and probably overridden by 
important state interests. But wouldn't a tax imposed on a class including 
religious institutions that was earmarked for a specific purpose -such as 
providing contraceptive services-raise a more difficult question?

Alan Brownstein

From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu 
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Ira Lupu
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 5:50 AM
To: Marc DeGirolami
Cc: Zietlow, Rebecca E.; Walsh, Kevin; Law & Religion issues for Law Academics; 
Con Law Prof list
Subject: Re: Contraceptives and gender discrimination

On the burden question -- Religious entities may limit hiring to 
co-religionists, and then make their best efforts to enforce religious norms 
against employees.  Doesn't that option make the burden of the HHS policy far 
less substantial?

I think a common reaction to the religious liberty claim being advanced here is 
its leveraging effect on employees who are not of the faith.  So even if some 
faiths have a religious mission to serve others, do they similarly have a 
religious mission to employ others?  Or is it their religious mission to impede 
access to contraception by all, whether or not of the faith?  If it's the 
latter, I don't know why their position is any different from or stronger than 
taxpayers who don't want to to support what they see as immoral activity by 
their government.
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to