I didn’t think the complicity argument was plausible until Hobby Lobby said otherwise.
> On Sep 16, 2015, at 2:00 PM, Michael Masinter <masint...@nsu.law.nova.edu> > wrote: > > What plausible reading of religious freedom empowers Ms. Davis to prohibit > her deputies from issuing marriage licenses because of her religious > objections to same sex marriage? -- Prof. Steven D. Jamar Assoc. Dir. of International Programs Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice http://iipsj.org http://sdjlaw.org "For all men of good will May 17, 1954, came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of enforced segregation. . . . It served to transform the fatigue of despair into the buoyancy of hope." Martin Luther King, Jr., in 1960 on Brown v. Board of Education
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
