--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, mch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > JOHN MACKEY wrote: > > > > I guess you won't need any more advice from us!! > > On the contrary. I think we will be answering a lot of questions... > > "What duplexer gives me the most off-freq rejection?" > > "What can I do to reduce TX noise" > > "Does anyone have a spectrum analyzer for sale?" > > Etc. > > > "ac0y5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Seeing as how these animals must have been TYPE > > > ACCEPTED for commertial use they must meet some minimal spectral > > > requirements. > > Well, at least ONE (the one submitted for acceptance) met some standards > at the time it was submitted. Of course, I don't know of any standards > for follow-up testing for when components break down. So, yes, at least > one met some kind of standards at one point. > > I'm not knocking Spectrum - I'm just relating experience. I have > yet to see one that stayed clean over the long haul. Any that > aren't clean surely can't meet the type acceptance they once had. > I've been interfered with from several 'type accepted' transmitters. > > This is one thing that Motorola always used to brag about when > submitting bids. While Motorola specs are 'guaranteed minimum specs', YEP, I've heard that from many a Motorola salesman. But experance, has told me that motorola will over SPEC a base transmitter for the sale. "SPEC ON DEMAND"
> many others are 'typical specs'. There IS a difference. With one, all > units meet the specs, with the other, half the units do - HALF DON'T! > Joe, I don't mind taking your comments, I read a little concern. Please read my response to MR MACKEYs post. 73 ALL > Joe M. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
