Jim, I agree. One could perform control functions on a say 10 meter repeater input in my option. A "primary" control method must be available and in place, but control can still be by other means. I would think someone calling a non-licensed Ham at the repeater site and allowing them to unplug the repeater to turn it off would be acceptable, but not to turn it on.
73, ron, n9ee/r >From: Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: 2007/11/08 Thu AM 11:07:26 CST >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 97 question reference to Repeater control > >Ron Wright wrote: >> John, >> >> Control on 144.39 is not allowed due to it not being an Auxiliary >> frequency. > >Change that to "PRIMARY" control. Nothing illegal about control on >144.39, just that that can't be the PRIMARY control. >-- >Jim Barbour >WD8CHL > > Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.
