Want to get more confused? And more OT?

HD radio (does NOT mean High Definition). I think it's Hybrid Digital.  They 
have channels with -1 & -2 which essentially is the digital sidebands that can 
contain different programming.  HD radio is causing all kinds of interference 
problems, especially with night time DX.

They would have been better off going to DRM.  Of course that would not be 
compatible with existing AM.  If we ever get the 76-88 MHz range for broadcast, 
DRM would work well there.

Ken

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: MCH 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 19:48 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Somewhat OT - How to make HDTV *really* work


  You know, I just though of another example that needs 'fixed'. My local 
  Channel 2 is on RF channel 2 on the cable system (a mistake, I'm sure). 
  4 is on 3, 11 is on 12, 53 is on 7, 22 is on 10, and 13 is on 9.

  If people can understand that the channel name isn't always the channel 
  number on the cable systems, why can't they understand the same will now 
  be true for DTV where 2 is on 25, 4 is on 51 and 11 is on 48???

  It seems that the main source of the confusion is the alias that shows 
  02-1 rather than 25-1. The very item designed to avoid confusion seems 
  to be the cause.

  Maybe we should just make it easy and make them use their callsigns 
  again so you can know WTAE is on OTA Channel 4 (STD), OTA Channel 51 
  (DTV), and 3 (STD) or 210 (DTV) on cable?

  BTW, KPBS is on OTA Channel 15 (STD) and Channel 30 (DTV). It may show 
  15-1 as an alias, but it's RF Channel 30 for the DTV signal.

  Joe M.

  MCH wrote:
  > You know, I was doubting the arguments posed by the government, but I'm 
  > starting to think they were right. It's just too much for the consumer 
  > to grasp DTV as it currently sits. I mean, if a *technical* bunch like 
  > this can't understand how a "channel 2" station can be on "RF channel 
  > 25", what hope is there for the consumer? Maybe it should be postponed 
  > indefinitely until the stations all get their original channels back or 
  > they simply change they logo from "Channel 2" to "Channel 25" and forget 
  > this alias "XX-Y" channel format.
  > 
  > Joe M.
  > 
  > Ken Decker wrote:
  >> Good grief folks, how difficult is this?
  >> 
  >> Checkout the website site below. For example: in San Diego it shows 
  >> KPBS as channel 15-1. Click on the call letters. It shows channel 15, 
  >> the former analog channel and what it still is identified as.. Then it 
  >> shows (RF 30), that's the channel it's on in the digital transition, but 
  >> it identifies as Channel 15-1.
  >> 
  >> The nice map also shows where the transmitter is located and a 
  >> engineering "SWAG" as to the signal level to expect.
  >> 
  >>
  >> The Digital TV Transition: DTV Reception Maps
  >>
  >> http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/maps/
  >> 
  >> Ken
  >> 
  >> 
  >> 
  >>
  >> ----- Original Message -----
  >> *From:* JOHN MACKEY <mailto:jmac...@usa.net>
  >> *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  >> <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
  >> *Sent:* Friday, March 06, 2009 12:41 PM
  >> *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Somewhat OT - How to make HDTV
  >> *really* work
  >>
  >> What is the callsign of the (ch. 7) station we are talking about?
  >>
  >> ------ Original Message ------
  >> Received: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:35:36 PM PST
  >> From: "Chuck Kelsey" <wb2...@roadrunner.com
  >> <mailto:wb2...@roadrunner.com>>
  >> To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  >> <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>>
  >> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Somewhat OT - How to make HDTV
  >> *really* work
  >>
  >> > The same.
  >> >
  >> >
  >> > ----- Original Message -----
  >> > From: "JOHN MACKEY" <jmac...@usa.net <mailto:jmackey%40usa.net>>
  >> > To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  >> <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>>
  >> > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 3:28 PM
  >> > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Somewhat OT - How to make HDTV
  >> *really*
  >> work
  >> >
  >> >
  >> > > What frequency was channel 7 digital and frequency channel 7
  >> analog?
  >> > >
  >> > > ------ Original Message ------
  >> > > Received: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:12:39 AM PST
  >> > > From: wd8chl <wd8...@gmail.com <mailto:wd8chl%40gmail.com>>
  >> > > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  >> <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
  >> > > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Somewhat OT - How to make HDTV
  >> *really*
  >> > > work
  >> > >
  >> > >> Paul Plack wrote:
  >> > >> > Jim,
  >> > >> >
  >> > >> > You might want to "READ IT AGAIN" yourself. Here's where the
  >> > >> > misunderstanding started.
  >> > >> >
  >> > >> > John wrote that if the digital is on a very different frequency,
  >> > >> > reception may be different. Your response was that if your
  >> antenna
  >> > >> > worked on one, it should work on the other, "Period." You
  >> appeared to
  >> > >> > have a misunderstanding. Don't get mad at people who try to
  >> help.
  >> > >> > That's kinda why this place exists.
  >> > >>
  >> > >> No, that's not what I said. I said that if an antenna works on CH7
  >> > >> analog, it should work on CH7 digital, and if it doesn't, the
  >> problem is
  >> > >> the source.
  >> > >>
  >> > >
  >> > >
  >> > >
  >> > >
  >> > >
  >> > > ------------------------------------
  >> > >
  >> > >
  >> > >
  >> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
  >> > >
  >> > >
  >> > >
  >> >
  >> >
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >> 
  >>
  >>
  >> ----------------------------------------------------------
  >>
  >> No virus found in this incoming message.
  >> Checked by AVG. 
  >> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.8 - Release Date: 3/4/2009 12:00 
AM
  > 
  > 
  > ------------------------------------
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > Yahoo! Groups Links
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 

  

Reply via email to