MCH wrote: > You know, I just though of another example that needs 'fixed'.
Do you mean that it 'needs to be fixed'? |cP My local > Channel 2 is on RF channel 2 on the cable system (a mistake, I'm sure). > 4 is on 3, 11 is on 12, 53 is on 7, 22 is on 10, and 13 is on 9. > > If people can understand that the channel name isn't always the channel > number on the cable systems, why can't they understand the same will now > be true for DTV where 2 is on 25, 4 is on 51 and 11 is on 48??? > > It seems that the main source of the confusion is the alias that shows > 02-1 rather than 25-1. The very item designed to avoid confusion seems > to be the cause. > > Maybe we should just make it easy and make them use their callsigns > again so you can know WTAE is on OTA Channel 4 (STD), OTA Channel 51 > (DTV), and 3 (STD) or 210 (DTV) on cable? > > BTW, KPBS is on OTA Channel 15 (STD) and Channel 30 (DTV). It may show > 15-1 as an alias, but it's RF Channel 30 for the DTV signal. > > Joe M. Could y'all just forget about the stupid virtual channel garbage? It's totally irrelevant to the point!
