< The duration-based "anti-kerchunk" filters are way more obnoxious than the kerchunkers IMHO, and they also block legitimate users who make quick calls. >
What Paul said :) One of the macros on our repeaters for special event/emergency comms use specifically turns OFF the anti-kerchunk filter for that same reason. 73s, AJ, K6LOR/R On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Paul Plack <pl...@xmission.com> wrote: > Your kerchunkers are most likely licensed hams. > > This is an issue as old as repeaters. It's illegal to kerchunk without > ID-ing, but there's not much you can do about it. Is the repeater PL access? > Use decode on your receiver, and all you'll hear is a quiet squelch break, > no courtesy tones, IDs or squelch tails (if it's set up right.) > > The duration-based "anti-kerchunk" filters are way more obnoxious than the > kerchunkers IMHO, and they also block legitimate users who make quick calls. > > 73, > Paul, AE4KR > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* retiredcss01 <tommy...@dfn.com> > *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > *Sent:* Friday, March 13, 2009 9:29 PM > *Subject:* [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kerchunk > > We have some on our repeater frequency, that just like to kerchunk the > repeater to hear it come back or ID. Is there any way we can eliminate this > annoying situation? I suspect that we may have an unlicensed individual with > a 2meter radio. > > Thanks > > >
