You might want to take a look at my project "thelinkbox".  It
supports the same <$10 USB audio dongles as Asterisk as well
as IRLP, EchoLink and Dril interfaces.  It can work independently
of EchoLink and IRLP.  You can setup a single Reflector/conference
and connect all of your repeaters to it if you like or use point
to point links.  Repeaters connected via the conference can still
operate full duplex.  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/thelinkbox/

73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "wa5jxy" <wa5...@...> wrote:
>
> OK, I have searched the ROIP posts, and I have to say all the posts I have 
> viewed just miss the point of what I am looking for.
> Yes, there are MANY ROIP commercial product related posts.
> All $$$$$$$$
> 
> What I am looking for is a SIMPLE and CHEAP solution for ROIP for AMATEUR 
> service.
> OK, I understand the commercial product line and the need for small business 
> solutions ($$$$). Raytheon NXU etc.
> 
> What about the amateur service trying to break into the ROIP solution?
> I built a P25 repeater for amateur service just because the technology is 
> there. It works and is cheaper than buying a complete P25 commercial repeater.
> 
> Now I want to build a ROIP interface similar to IRLP and Echolink without a 
> central server owned by someone else.
> I have the dedicated fiber infrastructure (10GB backbone) in place I can 
> utilize for ROIP.
> What I need is a schematic so I can build my own ROIP cards for PC or a cheap 
> already built card available on ebay.
> There must be a Asterisk and cheap card solution out there.
> Anybody already done this?
> 
> I have an Asterisk PBX server already built and working.
> Anybody set up Asterisk for ROIP and what card(s) did you use?
> I see then for $159 on ebay but I already have MANY parts and can build them 
> cheaper, but still need a schematic or pre-built card.
> If not, how about starting a discussion to do this?
> 
> My goal is to link several repeaters via ROIP other than echolink or IRLP.
> 
> Thanks!
> Neil WA5JXY
>


Reply via email to