Again, I will point out that just because you *can* do something it does not follow that you must or you should.
Their wording is obviously a block in which repeaters are legal. That does not mean repeaters are intended to cover the entire block. If you look carefully at Part 97, you will see that repeaters are legal everywhere except the satellite and other weak signal parts of the band. So, it's more of a matter that 146.520 is neither that it's included in the authorized repeater sub-band. And such a block does NOT make a bandplan. Again, CW is an authorized mode on all of 40M. Does that mean there should be no voice communications on 40M? Again, just because something is not illegal doesn't mean it should be done. I pointed this all out in previous posts. Joe M. JOHN MACKEY wrote: > Actually, part 97 DOES have what are, in effect, bandplans. Look in part > 97.205-B, where it defines the repeater sub-bands: > "A repeater may receive and retransmit only on the 10 m and shorter wavelength > frequency bands except the 28.0-29.5 MHz, 50.0-51.0 MHz, 144.0-144.5 MHz, > 145.5-146.0 MHz, 222.00-222.15 MHz, 431.0-433.0 MHz and 435.0-438.0 MHz > segments." > > 146.52 Mhz falls right in the middle of the FCC designated repeater band and > not in the frequency range which the FCC has reserved for simplex > communications! Someone could land a repeater input or output on 146.52 Mhz > and it would not be illegal. > > Just because a local planning group has or has not made a bandplan recognizing > a frequency does not make it illegal. > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > Received: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:25:52 PM PDT > From: MCH <m...@nb.net> > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Closed Repeaters > >> Odd. It's not in the repeater band segment in WPA, nor is it in the >> ARRL's bandplan, and Part 97 doesn't have bandplans - they jsut have >> spectrum where certain operations are legal, but that doesn't mean you >> have to use that mode. >> >> CW is legal everywhere per Part 97. Does that mean you should only >> operate CW on all HF bands? Including the segments where voice >> communications are permitted? (except perhaps 60M) >> >> Just because you are legal to do something does not mandate that you do >> something. And I know of no local bandplan where 146.520 MHz is a >> repeater output or input. Therefore, any such operation is against the >> bandplan and poor practice (which is against Part 97). >> >> Joe M. >> >> JOHN MACKEY wrote: >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> Received: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:55:42 AM PDT >>> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >>>>> Today if someone is using the output of a repeater frequency for a > simplex >>>>> conversation and someone else wanted to use the repeater then there > would >>>>> be interference to the conversation that was first on that >>>>> frequency. Could this be considered malicious interference? >>> Times like this it is interesting to point out the best known simplex > freq >>> of 146.52 MHz is in the repeater sub-band and NOT the simplex sub-band!! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.31/2265 - Release Date: 07/26/09 > 17:59:00 >
