To wrap this around to repeaters.... Where I live, which is admittedly  
not, say, California... there isn't a real spectrum problem on any of  
the FM repeater bands (if I may use such a term). There is a slight  
problem in some areas with the so-called "paper repeaters", but that's  
not a reason to narrow-band. It might be a reason to actually give  
coordination to those who really will keep a repeater up and  
operational, but not to narrow-band.

Is there a reason to do this other than creating more channels? And  
how many places desperately need the channels -- as in, even if the  
repeater pairs are all full, are the repeaters being used?

Just a thought...
73 DE N0MJS

On Oct 2, 2009, at 7:54 AM, Chuck Kelsey wrote:

> I've got to ask...
>
> Has anyone narrow-banded a Mastr II, Micor or similar vintage radio?  
> As most
> know, there is a ton of this type of equipment out there in repeater  
> and
> link service and I'm concerned that it may not convert easily or
> economically. This proposal could have huge unintended consequences if
> conversion isn't a good option.
>
> Chuck
> WB2EDV
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "MCH" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 8:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] ARRL Approves Study Committee to  
> Research &
> Develop Plan for Narrowband Channel Spacing
>
>
>> Great idea - let's emulate those whose communications systems are the
>> first to go down in a crisis while ours stay on the air.
>>
>> Joe M.
>>
>> Mark Thompson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> www.arrl.org/announce/board-0907/
>>> <http://www.arrl.org/announce/board-0907/>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Minutes of the 2009 Second Meeting*
>>> *ARRL Board of Directors*
>>>
>>> *Teleconference – July 17-18, 2009*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 29. On motion of Mr. Sarratt, seconded by Mr. Frenaye, the following
>>> resolution was ADOPTED:
>>>
>>>    WHEREAS, there is current substantial amateur radio movement,
>>>    activity, and innovation in the digital narrowband area; and
>>>
>>>    WHEREAS, the FCC has mandated that by 2013 commercial radio  
>>> move to
>>>    narrowband channels and Amateur Radio manufacturers normally  
>>> follow
>>>    commercial practices; and
>>>
>>>    WHEREAS, the VHF/UHF Amateur Radio band plan currently uses 15  
>>> and
>>>    20 kHz FM channels; and
>>>
>>>    WHEREAS, with the increasing use of narrowband across the country
>>>    amateurs are placing and using narrowband equipment outside the
>>>    repeater subband because there is no real place to fit the
>>>    narrowband pairs; and
>>>
>>>    WHEREAS, for ARRL to remain a respected leader in technology, we
>>>    must be actively involved in innovative solutions to problems by
>>>    bringing about a productive discussion on a technical paradigm
>>>    shift; now
>>>
>>>    *THEREFORE, the President shall appoint a study committee for the
>>>    purpose of research and to consider developing a plan to move  
>>> the US
>>>    amateur community to narrowband channel spacing.*
>>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

--
Cort Buffington
H: +1-785-838-3034
M: +1-785-865-7206






------------------------------------



Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to