I've disassembled and compared the ham-split PD633-6A-1N and regular 450-470
PD633-6A-2N.  The resonators are identical; they're the same length.  The
difference is where they are tapped - the low-split model is tapped about
1/4" further up the resonator than the 460 MHz version.  The semi-rigid
interconnect cables are slightly longer on the low-split model as you might
expect.  I took pictures and started writing it up as an article but never
finished...

                                        --- Jeff WN3A


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe
> Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 9:45 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RFS TDE-7780A
> 
>   
> 
> I wonder what they do to the internal coupling at the factory 
> when they 
> tune them. Maybe it is something that can be done in the field with a 
> little surgery?
> 
> Joe
> 
> Eric Lemmon wrote:
> > Point taken. One factor that will directly affect how the 
> subject duplexer
> > will perform at 70cm is where the original factory tuning 
> was. For example,
> > if the factory tuning was in the 450-455 MHz band, such a 
> duplexer will
> > likely perform better at 70cm than will a duplexer that 
> originally was
> > factory-tuned for the 460-465 MHz band. The results I 
> quoted were for a
> > duplexer in the latter class.
> >
> > 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] 
> <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> 
> > [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Joe
> > Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 2:59 PM
> > To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> 
> > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RFS TDE-7780A
> >
> > 
> >
> > Correct, but if I remember you were claiming 3dB loss at the pass 
> > frequencies. I was seeing about 1.5dB loss. I claimed respectable 
> > results, not perfect results. I think it is still 
> acceptable for ham 
> > use. Everything is a compromise when you push the equipment 
> past its 
> > limits, but the typical ham is frugal (aka me) and accepts a little 
> > degradation for economy.
> >
> > 73, Joe, K1ike
> > Another parsimonious Yankee ham.
> >
> > 73, Joe, K1ike
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2640 - Release 
> Date: 02/06/10 07:35:00
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to