I went from https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html
to https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria.html and saw this utter
BS:
- Follows the Web “Content” Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0)
standard. (A+3)
- Follows the Web Accessibility Initiative — Accessible Rich Internet
Applications 1.0 (WAI-ARIA 1.0) standard. (A+4)
Newsflash, you ableist jerks: not following those alone makes anything
an F, no matter what else they do or not. Did you design your fucking
self-serving "ethical" standards just so you could brag about it and it
alone getting an A?
--
English: he/him/his (singular they/them/their/theirs OK)
French: il/le/lui (iel/iel and ielle/ielle OK)
Tagalog: siya/niya/kaniya (please avoid sila/nila/kanila)
