[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > > "Regarding sending code that runs on the JavaScript platform, any such > > > code used by an important site function either (1) is free software, > > > *either* labeled properly for LibreJS > > ><https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/> to recognize as free *or with a > > > human-verifiable reference that links to relevant source code and > > > license files*, or (2) isn't necessary, so that the function works > > > properly even if JavaScript is disabled in the browser. If the proposed change consists of adding the text in asterisks, that is a bad idea. My decision is no. Depending on a "human-verifiable" page means telling each user to redo the work of verifying the code based on that page. That is a substantial amount of work. Instead of posting a "human-verifiable" page, they should post LibreJS tags or labeling, so that the verification can be done with LibreJS. That avoids the need for various humans to "human-verify" it. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
