On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 13:20, Alex Karasulu wrote: > I looked through the documentation and the proposals really are not > much. They're one pager brain dumps of nice to haves and standards that > are to be followed. There really is not much to cjan.org at this point > besides the web façade and the sf.net project.
They've been around longer than a year. I contacted them a little over two years ago to see what was up and they got rather huffy when I suggested what Maven was trying to do. They had even less around at that point but look at what they have now: 20 documents describing what they want to do and they've been around for 2 years and is there anything that incorporates their ideas in a working piece of software? No. So really, who cares about CJAN. The spec that goes defacto is the one manifest in the mechanism used by the most people. Unless of course SUN steps in at some point and tries to propose a JSR which wouldn't surprise me at all. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://maven.apache.org happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it will elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will come and sit softly on your shoulder ... -- Thoreau
