> On Nov. 20, 2016, 9:04 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> > Nice first patch and welcome to the community!
> > 
> > - Can you update the Testing Done section with details on testing?
> > - We also support Python bindings. Do you mind adding these protos to our 
> > python build too in a follow up review? (See my comments later on how you 
> > can use review dependencies if you are new to ReviewBoard)

Thanks Anand. I have made the python binding changes locally on my machine. Do 
you want me to create a new JIRA bug for this issue and create a new review or 
add the patch to this JIRA/review itself? I am little confused as to how the 
dependencies are handled with RB.


- Vijay


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53825/#review156423
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 21, 2016, 4:35 a.m., Vijay Srinivasaraghavan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53825/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 21, 2016, 4:35 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6597
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6597
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> MESOS-6597 Enabled java protos generation for all V1 proto files.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/v1/allocator/allocator.proto 
> 73d45b37a7afc47366a4a01a36912f30b47c30b1 
>   src/Makefile.am 5a47c93388234a68c3c486a021ccdbe3213c5bac 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53825/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vijay Srinivasaraghavan
> 
>

Reply via email to