> On Nov. 20, 2016, 9:04 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> > Nice first patch and welcome to the community!
> > 
> > - Can you update the Testing Done section with details on testing?
> > - We also support Python bindings. Do you mind adding these protos to our 
> > python build too in a follow up review? (See my comments later on how you 
> > can use review dependencies if you are new to ReviewBoard)
> 
> Vijay Srinivasaraghavan wrote:
>     Thanks Anand. I have made the python binding changes locally on my 
> machine. Do you want me to create a new JIRA bug for this issue and create a 
> new review or add the patch to this JIRA/review itself? I am little confused 
> as to how the dependencies are handled with RB.
> 
> Anand Mazumdar wrote:
>     No need to create a separate issue. It would be fine to create a new 
> review with it only containing the python related changes. This would be 
> another commit based on top of this one. You can then use `post-reviews.py` 
> and it should handle setting the dependencies for you. Feel free to ping me 
> on IRC/Slack if you run into any issues (anandm)
> 
> Vijay Srinivasaraghavan wrote:
>     Thanks for the clarification. I have attached a new patch with "53825" as 
> dependendency
> 
> Vijay Srinivasaraghavan wrote:
>     I have created two patch for those additional issues that was addressed 
> as part of the original request. Please let me know if you are waiting for 
> anything from my end before this can be merged? Thanks  
>     https://reviews.apache.org/r/54014/
>     https://reviews.apache.org/r/54015/
> 
> Anand Mazumdar wrote:
>     Sorry for the delay. I would get to them sometime later this week. There 
> is nothing needed from your end for now.

Thanks Anand


- Vijay


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53825/#review156423
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 23, 2016, 5:46 a.m., Vijay Srinivasaraghavan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53825/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 23, 2016, 5:46 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6597
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6597
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> MESOS-6597 Enabled java protos generation for all V1 proto files.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am 5e0b8406f7f624bd8b03ff76b887f20e22fc66e0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53825/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Built mesos and confirmed jar file containing new java PB wrappers for V1 
> API. Ran standard unit test (make tests)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vijay Srinivasaraghavan
> 
>

Reply via email to