> On March 19, 2020, 10:47 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> > src/master/validation.cpp
> > Lines 1839-1845 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/72216/diff/5/?file=2214199#file2214199line1839>
> >
> >     So we have this validation only for the tasks within a task group but 
> > not for the tasks launched by `LAUNCH` operation? That means for the task 
> > whose `share_cgroups` is true, if it is launched by `LAUNCH_GROUP` then it 
> > is not allowed to specify resource limits, but if it is launched by 
> > `LAUNCH` then it is allowed to specify resource limits, this may confuse 
> > users, do we want to make them consistent? Like always allow to specify 
> > resource limits for any tasks. If we do this, then I think we may need to 
> > update the comments of the `TaskInfo.limits` and `Task.limits` protobuf 
> > message fields, since that field may have different meaning depending on 
> > the value of `share_cgroups`, like if `share_cgroups==false`, it is the 
> > limits of the task itself, otherwise the task may share limits with other 
> > tasks launched by the same executor.

I think we talked a lot during the design stage about why it doesn't make sense 
for resource limits to be set on task groups with share_cgroups==true. In 
hindsight, I wish we could have restricted this API to work only for task 
groups, but maybe that's not feasible. I would definitely prefer to still not 
allow task groups to set limits when share_cgroups==true.

For most users (i.e. users who don't use custom executors), launching task 
groups is the only time that they will send multiple tasks/task groups to a 
single executor, so I think that's the case we really care about. I can update 
the comments accordingly.


- Greg


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72216/#review219999
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 19, 2020, 2:10 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72216/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 19, 2020, 2:10 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik and Qian Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-10045
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10045
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added master validation for task resource limits and shared cgroups.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/validation.cpp 084f281eadd65cb8ae0a19b7b7797dc71ccebdd2 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72216/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>

Reply via email to