On Thu, May 15, 2025, at 14:21, Carsten Bormann wrote: > Refused to apply style from > 'https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc-local.css' because its MIME type > ('text/html') is not a supported stylesheet MIME type, and strict MIME > checking is enabled.
That resource is not present. However, there is this feature in xml2rfc where a link is added to "rfc-local.css" always. It's a misfeature, but it's in RFC 7992: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7992#section-6.3.6 > rfc9633.html:5138 Error: <path> attribute d: Expected number, > "…1.823502 -0.894,1./841556 h -1.0…". That looks like an error in the path, probably a stray character adding during an edit pass and not detected. My guess is that it's the cause of the error in the diagram in B.3, which is missing part of a path for me. > Oh, and why is there an > > xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#” > > on the SVGs… Probably because it wasn't fully cleaned up during editing. Some authoring tools include RDF-based metadata in the SVG files. Others use private namespaces for that. It is harmless, though would not also make the mistake of calling RDF itself harmless. _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
