Hi Martin,
On 5/14/25 11:28 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2025, at 14:21, Carsten Bormann wrote:
Refused to apply style from
'https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc-local.css' because its MIME type
('text/html') is not a supported stylesheet MIME type, and strict MIME
checking is enabled.
That resource is not present. However, there is this feature in xml2rfc where a link is
added to "rfc-local.css" always. It's a misfeature, but it's in RFC 7992:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7992#section-6.3.6
rfc9633.html:5138 Error: <path> attribute d: Expected number,
"…1.823502 -0.894,1./841556 h -1.0…".
That looks like an error in the path, probably a stray character adding during
an edit pass and not detected. My guess is that it's the cause of the error in
the diagram in B.3, which is missing part of a path for me.
Oh, and why is there an
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#”
on the SVGs…
Probably because it wasn't fully cleaned up during editing. Some authoring
tools include RDF-based metadata in the SVG files. Others use private
namespaces for that. It is harmless, though would not also make the mistake of
calling RDF itself harmless.
[JM] Is this something svgcheck should flag? Is this something the RPC
should clean up?
Thanks!
Jean
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
