On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:35:09AM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > Ah, that works. On the HTML at the datatracker[0] that figure is > > unreadable, > > I assume you mean the one that the tracker quaintly calls "htmlized"?
Yes, but that's not really the critical thing for me (though I do actually like the looks of the paginated htmlized). The important thing is the metadata that does change: obsoleted by, updated by, moved to historic, errata links, history, and all of that being on the sidebar. Also, the htmlized supports dark mode, whereas the rfc-editor.org site does not -- if we care about accessibility then we should definitely have a darkmode there as well. > You are absolutely correct about the reflowing problem, but that's > intrinsic to HTML. Er, for the htmlized there's no reflowing, actually, but at some point the next ctrl-+ completely shifts where the viewport is on the doc. Nico -- _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
