Hi all,
The RPC will be working on guidelines for imagery accessibility with the
community.
For this doc, the RPC asked the authors to make updates to the SVG to
fix spacing and terminology inconsistencies as we don't have the ability
to edit diagrams like this. Because a reader could zoom in, we did not
push back on the layout or font size. The discussion about the usability
of the diagrams should have started while the doc was in the WG. The
feedback during LC, though, was that the diagrams were helpful and "very
nice".
In the future, I think that we will see more complex diagrams like this
as more authors use SVG. We will need to provide guidance to make these
kinds of diagrams more accessible: for example, using fonts that are
customizable by the reader.
Best regards,
Jean
On 5/14/25 7:01 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2025, at 00:16, Jean Mahoney wrote:
(Artwork only available as SVG: see
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9633.html)
Figure 1: Case A-1: Application Flow Aggregation
Wow, I hadn't seen these diagrams before. They are completely unreadable. The
text is so small I needed a 240% zoom to make out some of it. Appendix B.3 has
a diagram that has text overlapping lines and missing lines. At the same time,
these are somewhat helpful, it's just that they have far too much detail to be
readable.
I realize that these are just examples in appendices, but I don't think that
this are good examples.
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
