On 17 Sep 2025, at 19:09, Eric Rescorla wrote: > To be clear, what I was trying to say was not that all the RPC's changes > should be in one PR -- though I think that's easiest for the RPC at this > point -- but rather that as they iterate on a given set of changes they > should be in a single PR.
How do you picture those author responses to the PR going? Simply as comments in the PR? Text changes done as commits in the branch that created the PR? Or something else? I ask because I suck at commenting in PRs for documents, and when I do so, I get wildly different advice from the authors about the proper way to comment in a PR. It would be good if the RPC could say to authors ahead of time how the authors should interact with the PR (just as they are told how to respond to AUTH48 email). --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
