On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Sam Folk-Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > Kenton Brede wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Sam Folk-Williams <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks for highlighting these Yum issues. I'd like to get as much of this >>> info as I can into our Knowledge base. >>> >>> It looks like several people on the list have hit the bug mentioned >>> (448012) >>> >>> For that issue, we've put together this kbase: >>> http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-15495 >> >> Sam, >> >> But if we downgrade to yum-rhn-plugin-0.5.2-3.el5.noarch.rpm then we >> are open to the following security vulnerability: > > Hi Kent, > > This is a good point. I realize that neither solution is perfect (downgrade > and you get the bugs that the version fixed, stay the same and you get the > bug that this version introduced). We have the fix, but the packages need to > go through QA testing before they are released. > > If you have a Red Hat subscription there are two other options: > > * Get the beta package from RHN > * Contact support for more options (http://support.redhat.com)
Sam, I'll grab the beta package. Thanks, Kent _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
