On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM, John Oliver wrote: > The resources I found with Google did not address my questions. I have > no doubt that Red Hat employees, being intimately familiar with the > various systems and content therein find stuff like this painfully > obvious. But to those of us who do not live and breath Red Hat errata > and simply look for one answer at a time, what I've found is deficient. > It might be perfect for internal tracking, but it was, clearly, of less > help to me than it could, or should, have been. By plan or accident, > these bugzilla pages are what come up in a Google search. If they're > not the "right" place to find answers, maybe some SEO would be in order.
There is a disconnect here. The typical RHEL customer would go to redhat.com and click "support" and so would never be in bugzilla in the first place. Via google you get CVE page that links to the RHN page: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-0005 As an academic Red Hat user who happens to know about bugzilla I sometimes will add a comment noting that a patch was backported, but that's really just for fun. _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
