I suppose I was ranting here a lot, and I also apologize if I did any unnecessary harm. It is the product of living on a user's front line far from system integrators or stock exchange markets with strange 64-bit hardware or mainframes. Maybe I have over-exaggerated significance of Xen for the open source, or it might contribute separately from RHEL better really. Also, put aside my view about Itanium's destiny, and my ranting about it. But there are some points I've made that are left somewhat unnoticed, of which one I find most interesting: what about HP Blade infrastructure and Red Hat's involvement about it (which is very low) ? Mostly I would like to see RHEV beside VMWare and Hyper-V (RH has only some initiative about making RHEL/Jboss templates for VMWare or similar). In the end, please notice that I am a happy Red Hat customer and I would always rather step on the side of Linux and Open Source solutions whenever/wherever it is possible, though I am bound to a world where it is very hard to achieve it (both for good and bad reasons). Best regards, Zoran Popovic.
2010/4/6 Janne Blomqvist <[email protected]> > On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 01:43:55PM -0400, Bryan J Smith wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 20:19 +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > > > Huh? That's a quite long-winded way of telling us that you didn't > > > bother to read the linked article beyond extrapolating from the > > > headline. > > > > I read it. > > It seems I completely misread your post then. My apologies. > > > > Then again, why let such provincial matters get in the way of a rant. > ;-) > > Yes, in retrospect that was, perhaps, a bit mean and uncalled > for. Again, my apologies. > > -- > Janne Blomqvist > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list >
_______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
