And yes, I know what are you talking about and how right you are, but it
sooo easy for you to say that now. I wish you or anyone else could tell me
how it really feels to be where I am now and doing what I have to do now ...
if anyone can imagine that or anything similar at all, let alone some
constructive thoughts ... I will let you know if I find out, it would be
nice to know.
ZP.

2010/1/18 Zoran Popović <[email protected]>

>
>
> 2010/1/18 John Haxby <[email protected]>
>
>>
>>
>> 2010/1/18 Zoran Popović <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>>  I would imagine other vendors would offer me migration roadmap [...]
>>> [B]eing informed years ahead what exact option he has.
>>>
>>>
>> I've don't think I'm mis-quoting with those two phrases, but there are two
>> separate things here.  A migration "roadmap" (for want of a better word) and
>> being informed well in advance.
>>
>>
> Yes, I was writing something in distress, that is not what I was trying to
> say - just erase that line in whatever memory it's stored ...
>
>
>> You have a migration roadmap: it's implicit in the platform: the self-same
>> operating system is available on Itanium and on x86_64.  The same apps
>> (more-or-less) are available on both; isn't migration straightfoward?  I
>> can't answer that, you'd have to ask the people responsible for the apps on
>> your systems.
>>
>>
> Yeah, I know that, as told previously - SAP + Oracle are main applications,
> I have done many tests (and migrations, at least with Oracle), but that is
> not the point - the main problem is that neither anyone here is willing here
> to invest into different hardware architecture at the moment (everything is
> HP based, so Itanium was a natural way) and that we need virtualization
> technology for these systems, nor there is a will by key decision maker to
> admit that Windows was a risky, if not very poor decision (it was planned
> initially to be HP-UX).
>
>
>> You have also been informed well in advance.  RHEL5 support will continue
>> until 2014 and RHEL6 hasn't even been announced as a beta yet.   Do you
>> expect your existing Itanium servers to keep running after 2014?  I'm sure
>> you can pay Red Hat to provide continued support after 2014 if that's the
>> case -- ask Red Hat.  And you haven't invested in Itanium for RHEL6 have
>> you?
>>
>>
> If it is possible - correct me if I'm wrong, after 2014 RHEL5 support will
> be available only through OEMs ? I could imagine HP skinning us alive ... I
> am satisfied with RHEL support so far, if that would be available after
> 2014, then it's fine.
>
>
>>
>> I haven't seen a chorus of people calling for RHEL6 on Itanium either here
>> or anywhere else.  In fact I don't think I have seen anyone but you
>> bemoaning this decision.   Have you told your Red Hat contact what you
>> think?  What did they say (if its not under some NDA)?   I wouldn't be at
>> all surprised if the decision was that it's not economically sound to
>> support a dwindling platform, that the sales of Itanium licenses don't
>> justify the development costs.
>>
>>
> Would anything change if we obtain development subscription ? How much does
> it cost, give me a hint ? Ok, many things happened since I've met someone
> from Red Hat last time (about a year ago) - the main problem is that I was
> instructed by CIO not to contact them directly (only through support) for
> some stupid reason, even though the local RH call center is right here in
> the same city, few kilometers away ... that is why I am starting to ask
> around for any other possible contact. Given all these facts, I was aware
> already that there's nothing much to do, but if you have any idea ... ok, I
> did find some pills ...
>
>
>> Technically, it's a shame.  Both Alpha and Itanium will be missed by many,
>> but both have missed the boat.
>>
>> jch
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rhelv5-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list

Reply via email to