On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 13:56 +0100, Ben wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Paul Smith wrote: > > It seems very strange to me that you'd have to disable the standard > > network service in order to use NetworkManager (or disable NM to use the > > standard network service). What if I wanted some of my interfaces to be > > managed with NM and others not? > > Isn't that what > NM_CONTROLLED="no" > is for in ifcfg-ethN?
Well I can't find that flag described in the RHEL documentation, but even so the suggestion was to disable the "network" service. If I disable "network", and I set "NM_CONTROLLED=no", then what will handle that interface? That's what I'm trying to say: I don't think that completely disabling "network" is the right way to solve this problem. _______________________________________________ rhelv6-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list
