m1abrams;372557 Wrote: > Well no i have not tested recently. However your test does back me up. > 50% longer for in your test a 0.3% space savings. You were running on > pretty modern machine with fairly high specs, some of us do not have > that hardware so the time difference will be even greater.
As I said with flac -8 I get VERY FAST encoding speed! Latest FLAC versions has dramatic speed improvements. One 74 min. CD is usually encoded in about 1 minute or less. Is it really so much asked? CD Ripping itself takes A LOT longer. And why not use some space savings if encoding takes so little time? P.S. FLAC 1.2.1 (17-Sep-2007), Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz, 2GB RAM -- Bytec ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bytec's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17676 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=56657 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
