On Jun 27, 2016, at 22:21, drew Roberts <zotz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Given that this is the case and since it does not seem like it is a problem 
> that will go away, is there a safe way to have rivendell make this check and 
> run the rdadmin bits automatically on such an upgrade?

Schema updates are handled automatically by rpm(8) every time an updated 
Rivendell RPM is applied and have been for many years.  While it certainly 
won’t hurt to run RDAdmin after such, it’s not really necessary *in those 
cases*.  I emphasize that last because there are many ways out there to install 
and update Rivendell, some on platforms that do not support RPM at all. This is 
why we put that warning about running RDAdmin after updates in every release 
announcement.


> How can such automation of the database upgrade blow things up horribly and 
> thus make this a terrible idea? 

I’m far from convinced that the database update *per se* is blowing anything 
up, on the basis of the many sites that have made transition to v2.14.1 without 
incident as well as my own tests here.  I suspect that we may have a confluence 
of factors operating: upgrade to CentOS 6.8, *along with* upgrade to Rivendell 
v2.14.1, *along with* ALSA sound setups.  I’ve not been able to reproduce this 
problem here at all.

Cheers!


|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Frederick F. Gleason, Jr. |              Chief Developer             |
|                           |              Paravel Systems             |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          A room without books is like a body without a soul.         |
|                                         -- Cicero                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev

Reply via email to