On Monday 29 August 2016 04:32:58 pm David Klann wrote: > That is, maybe a > "rivendell-server" package that would contain just the "headless" > components, and maybe a "rivendell-client" package that contains the GUI > components. > > Another option (and likely highly desirable) would be to mirror the > current (reference) CentOS scheme
Though I'm told there is one other already, the plan at "my place" is to do something very similar, "virtualizing" Rivendell pretty much throughout the plant. We're planning two servers ( for redundancy ) in the racks, and the five studios will be getting "client" installations for the operators, on Rasberry PI's. Should be quieter, less electrical load, we figure more reliable, and definitely less costly to maintain once built. Therefore, I'd keep a close eye on the main line CentOS, which is what it'll all be, before I ran off in a different direction. Just a thot... -- Cowboy http://cowboy.cwf1.com _______________________________________________ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
