Hi, On 5/31/07, Gianugo Rabellino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before formally stating my +1 (I have no objections), and with a lot of excuses from my part given I probably missed that bit, I see that no contribution is under an org.apache namespace. Is this the way it was agreed to proceed?
There was some discussion earlier on how to handle the package namespaces with most of the specifications in net.jini, but some of the essential parts also in com.sun.jini. I think (didn't pay too much attention at the time, so I might be wrong) the rough consensus was to keep net.jini as the spec namespace and to migrate from com.sun.jini to org.apache.river by time as the potential backwards compatibility issues are sorted out. I think it makes sense to bring the code in as-is and sort out the migration to org.apache before the first release. BR, Jukka Zitting
