Re: [VOTE] Accept the Starter Kit Contribution from Sun Microsystems

[Craig L Russell]

+1






Craig

On Jun 1, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Dan Creswell wrote:

It's ok to bring in source code with the original package name and do the rename/move in the Apache repository. Or rename it beforehand, your choice. Just remember to rename it to the official apache names before you make a release! ;-)

John McClain - Sun Microsystems, Inc. wrote:

Jukka Zitting wrote:

Hi,

On 5/31/07, Gianugo Rabellino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Before formally stating my +1 (I have no objections), and with a lot of excuses from my part given I probably missed that bit, I see that no contribution is under an org.apache namespace. Is this the way it

was agreed to proceed?

There was some discussion earlier on how to handle the package
namespaces with most of the specifications in net.jini, but some of

keep net.jini as the spec namespace and to migrate from com.sun.jini
to org.apache.river by time as the potential backwards compatibility
issues are sorted out. I think it makes sense to bring the code in
as-is and sort out the migration to org.apache before the first
release.

the essential parts also in com.sun.jini. I think (didn't pay too much attention at the time, so I might be wrong) the rough consensus was to

This is my memory also

+1

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature