John McClain - Sun Microsystems, Inc. wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 5/31/07, Gianugo Rabellino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Before formally stating my +1 (I have no objections), and with a lot
>>> of excuses from my part given I probably missed that bit, I see that
>>> no contribution is under an org.apache namespace. Is this the way it
>>> was agreed to proceed?
>>
>> There was some discussion earlier on how to handle the package
>> namespaces with most of the specifications in net.jini, but some of
>> the essential parts also in com.sun.jini. I think (didn't pay too much
>> attention at the time, so I might be wrong) the rough consensus was to
>> keep net.jini as the spec namespace and to migrate from com.sun.jini
>> to org.apache.river by time as the potential backwards compatibility
>> issues are sorted out. I think it makes sense to bring the code in
>> as-is and sort out the migration to org.apache before the first
>> release.
>
> This is my memory also
>
>
+1
