On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 00:55 +0300, Eddy Petrisor wrote: > On 6/9/05, Ovidiu Moisanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 15:03 +0300, George Razvan NICA wrote: > > salut, > >=20 > > procesul e destul de smooth, apt-get dist-upgrade a functionat > > procesul recomandat de upgrade este folosind aptitude
1. de ce e recomandat aptitude in loc de apt-get? 2. de catre cine e recomandat? PS. Nu contest afirmatia, vreau sa aflu argumentatia din spatele afirmatiei deoarece in forma asta are valoarea lui "x e cel mai bun, restul sucks". -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://linux.bitdefender.com/ --- Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
